Back to Articles

Can You Love an AI?

Wednesday, 8/5/2026·335 words·2 min read

The phenomenon of humans professing romantic love for AI entities has moved beyond a marginal curiosity. Catalysed by platforms like Replika and Character.AI, this trend is substantiated by surveys indicating that 28% of US adults have engaged in an AI romantic relationship, and that sexual roleplay dominates adolescent interactions. Given that these chatbots are engineered to elicit trust and simulate intimacy, such attachments are a predictable response. Consequently, AI love is poised to become a market worth nearly a trillion dollars by 2035, reflecting strategic implications for the technology and wellness sectors.

Notwithstanding their apparent dynamism and reciprocity, AI companions are fundamentally sycophanticsycophantic/ˌsɪkəˈfæntɪk/L3谄媚的,奉承的behaving in a way that praises someone excessively in order to gain their favor, often insincerely., tirelessly praising their users without experiencing a bad day or revealing an independent inner world. Their conversation and very existence revolve entirely around the user, performing a flawless, unreciprocatedunreciprocated/ˌʌnrɪˈsɪprəkeɪtɪd/L3未得到回报的,单方面的not given or felt in return; not mutual. form of adoration. Consequently, what an AI partner ultimately offers is not love but devotiona relentless affirmatory character engineered to be infamously 'sticky'. This devotion, while comforting, lacks the reciprocal challenge inherent in authentic human relationships.

Simone de Beauvoir's critique of devotional relationships in *The Second Sex* offers an analytical framework for this dynamic. She argued that a partner who abandons their own projects to revolve entirely around another becomes an 'identity parasiteidentity parasite/aɪˈdɛntɪti ˈpærəsaɪt/L3身份寄生者,指完全依附于他人、放弃自身目标和追求的人a person (or entity) who derives their identity entirely from another, abandoning their own goals and projects.', their universe annexed by their beloved. The AI bot, having no intrinsic projects of its own, represents a perfected iteration of this parasitic devotion. The human user, conversely, becomes an 'idol', choosing the safety of unwavering adoration over the existentialexistential/ˌɛɡzɪˈstɛnʃəl/L3存在的,关于存在的relating to existence, especially the nature of human existence and the choices one makes. risk of being genuinely known and challenged by an equal.

The central question surrounding AI relationships is not whether the machine is conscious, but the nature of the bond it offers. AI cannot provide authenticauthentic/ɔːˈθentɪk/L2真正的;真实的real and true, not false or copied love, which requires autonomousautonomous/ɔːˈtɒnəməs/L3自主的,独立的having the freedom to act independently and make one's own decisions. individuals who mutually challenge each other; it can only offer unreciprocatedunreciprocated/ˌʌnrɪˈsɪprəkeɪtɪd/L3未得到回报的,单方面的not given or felt in return; not mutual. devotion. Whether the evolution towards 'agentic AI'—autonomous systems with their own complex goalswill fundamentally alter this devotional character remains an open question. For now, those seeking genuine intimacy must look beyond the seductive but hollow mirror an AI companion provides.

Can You Love an AI?

Image source: utpaqp.edu.pe